AI gets your company facts wrong. Here is the enterprise correction workflow
Where wrong answers come from, how long each engine takes to change its mind, and the ledger that keeps Legal calm.
It usually surfaces sideways: a broker forwards a screenshot, an investor quotes an assistant during due diligence, or a sales call opens with "I read that your project is delayed." The wrong fact had been served for weeks before anyone noticed.
Wrong answers have four common causes
You can't edit an AI answer directly. You change it by fixing what the engine reads. The first step is tracing the claim back to one of these causes[1]:
How long each engine takes to change its mind
Engines that answer from live search can flip within weeks of the corrected page being recrawled. Errors from training data don't move until the model is updated. One published dataset of median correction times[2]:
The workaround for errors in training data is to make the correct fact dominant in the sources the engine retrieves, so answers stay right while the model's memory stays wrong[2].
The six-step correction workflow
The error ledger
Legal and Brand don't need a dashboard. They need a ledger: every wrong claim, where it came from, what was changed, and when it was confirmed fixed.
| Surface | Question | Wrong fact | Source fixed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI chat | Is the project on schedule? | Handover 2028 | Portal listing · 12 Aug | Corrected |
| AI overview | Developer escrow bank | Wrong bank named | Facts page · 14 Aug | Monitoring |
| Answer engine | Payment plan options | 60/40 missing | Press release · 18 Aug | Open |
Own-goals to avoid
- Blocking AI crawlers in frustration. Your corrections become invisible too.
- Publishing rebuttals that repeat the false claim word for word.
- Rewriting pages the engines never read, instead of the pages they cite.
- Fake reviews or personas. They rarely last, and they create legal risk.
